|
Hindu Phobia
By Arvasthan Singh Lahori
August 10, 2000
In UK it is customary to blame everything on the weather. Globally
it has been permissible to blame various social ills on Hindus. In
India, Shri Dara Singh has been blamed for an incredible amount of
hate crimes for which there is no evidence. But the climate
internationally, as well as in most domestic scenarios, is not
inclined to accept Hinduphobia, or anti-Hindism, as a hate crime.
Indeed its very manifestation is either ignored or explained away
under an ambiguous phrase, such as ‘communal riot’ or
‘ethnic rivalry’. Supposedly objective reports and opinions
usually denigrate attempts to resist Hinduphobia as a hate crime
in itself, usually ‘Hindu Fascism’ or ‘Hindu
fundamentalism’. This is a very extraordinary and ironic
conclusion to draw.
Hindus face attack from a variety of highly contradictory and even
mutually antagonistic forces. Each will be examined in turn.
Christians have always looked at the ‘Other’ as infidels,
unbelievers, the damned. The secularisation of the west has forced
Christians to be increasingly circumspect in their objectives. As
the only large remaining vestige of ‘polytheists’ or
‘pagans’, Hindus are viewed as unprotected fair game.
Amazingly this is done under the creature of tolerance and
interfaith dialogue. But this sugar coating of understanding hides
a noxious pellet of conversion and cultural genocide. Massive
missionary efforts are channelled into converting Hindus.
Marginalised within their own western nations, Christians now
throw all effort to the developing world, notably India, using
poverty, natural disasters, illiteracy, and the legacy of years of
Communist-style economic planning to ensnare the innocent and
vulnerable. Thus in India millions of Hindus have become alienated
from their Dharma and cultural roots. In the west, missionaries
are also active, exploiting the vestigial spirituality even the
most Macaulist of Hindus have, to veer them into the Asuric net.
Satya Bhavan in UK exploits Hindu self-alienation and the
cross-cultural quagmire in this way. But the impact of Christian
Hinduphobia goes beyond even this. It has been largely responsible
for the negative and distorted images which the western media has
of Hindus, such as ‘fundamentalist’, ‘Fascist’ and
‘regressive’, facets more appropriate to Christianity itself.
When Hindus counter Christianisation, they are immediately accused
of these very vile features themselves. Hence Dara Singh is
automatically a ‘Fascist’.
As the logical extension to Christianity, Islam views Hindus as
‘kaffirs’, infidels. Hindu attempts to resist Islamisation and
dismemberment of Mata Bharat are decried as ‘Nazi’ and
‘intolerant’. This is incredible hypocrisy, due to both
Islamic ideological affinity to Fascism, and the extreme violence
Islamists have perpetrated against Hindus for the last 1,400
years. One could fill reams of pages and books with the details,
as has been done, after years of pure apologetics and falsified
history. Indeed the violence has continued unabated to this day in
Saudi, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and even India
itself with the full support of Muslims globally. It has also
spread to the west. In UK Hindus face Islamic defamation and
violence with little resistance. One of Islam’s best tools is
the Bollywood film industry. Controlled by Islamic mafia based in
Pakistan and Dubai, the constant stream of cellular excrement
numbs the Hindu mind, demeans Hindu Dharma, and glorifies Islam in
very subtle ways, especially with its heroes always some
‘Khan’ marrying Hindu women so as to propagate the Islamic
species. To Islam, dialogue is only possible if Hindus convert to
the ideology which espouses Arab nationalist supremacy, and has
brainwashed millions of former Hindus into ‘wannabee’ Arabs.
Unlike Christianity, Islam has yet to experience secularisation,
an objective examination of its beliefs. Its super egotism thus
remains un-punctured.
Nazis and Fascists hate Hindus because the vast majority are
Indian, and thus dark-skinned, sub-human, inferior mud people. It
is well known that Hitler believed that the British Raj should
continue in India indefinitely, to accord with his beliefs in
white supremacy. In the west, notably Europe, Hindus have been
subject to extreme racial violence. Rather than resist, they leave
the work to Communist, Islamic, Christian or other organisations
with some ulterior Asuric motives themselves. In South Africa,
Indians were placed midway between whites and blacks in the racial
hierarchy. The Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) has been used by Nazis
from Hitler to David Duke as proof that Hindu and general
‘black’ inferiority. But Nazis come in all colours. On the
opposite racial pole, black Nazis use the AIT as proof that Hindus
were the pioneers of a primeval anti-black apartheid, the caste
system. Aside from the fact that chaturvarna, and even its
degeneration into the caste system, was not racially related, at
least as far as Hindus were concerned, black Nazis in UK and USA
also look at Hindus as soft and inferior racial targets. In
Africa, Hindus have commonly been the victims of black Nazism. As
it was in Uganda in 1972, so it threatens to be in Zimbabwe in
2000. David Duke and Louis Farrakhan differ only on the identity
of the master race. A similar parallel can be drawn between Enoch
Powell and George Speight, for Naziphile Hinduphobes have no
racial or geographical boundaries. The recent events in Fiji
should have demonstrated this much.
Marxists on the other hand have placed Hindus in the same cess pit
as Nazis. They cite the swastika symbol, the AIT, and the caste
system as evidence. Now the swastika is an ancient symbol found in
many cultures, which span the globe. The fact that it was poached
by the Nazis to be the flag of their intellectually moribund
Asurism does not make Hindus Nazis. The AIT has been exposed as a
Victorian era colonialist manufacture to justify European
dominance in India and elsewhere. So we are left with the
Marxists’ secret arsenal, the caste system, supposedly the
paradigm of the class struggle par excellence. But as always,
Marxist pseudo-scientific conclusions are flawed from the start.
The chaturvarna degenerated into caste under 1,400 years Islamic
rule, itself having a racial hierarchy and chauvinism with regard
to the Hindus, in addition to its many other unpleasant aspects.
But even at the chaturvarna theory, if we examine this issue
alone, the idea is not one of class conflict, but social harmony.
Hindu Dharma does not create division, but neither does it deny
that they exist. If social hierarchy and differentiation are
inherent human characteristics, then far better to harmonise them
than play the fantasy of their non-existence. In this way
chaturvarna then tries to emphasise the common good and equal
value each varna (class) plays in the process, just as the human
body co-ordinates the head and limbs to work together. In theory
class exploitation should not arise, just as one cannot accuse the
eyes of exploiting the feet. The fact that it does is due to again
to inherent human weakness. Yet the avowedly Communist societies
had, and remnants retain, great social polarization, more so than
the supposedly backward capitalist and feudal spheres. North
Korea, China, and the former ‘Proletariat Paradise’ of
Romania, are prime examples of class exploitation in the
Marxist-Leninist paradigm. The falloff the Berlin Wall,
revolutions in eastern Europe, and the mercerization of China have
not made one iota of difference, and got Marxists thinking about
their assumed superiority to Hindutva.
Then there is the mass of self-hating Hindus, the Macaulites, best
explained as Hinduphobic Hindus. This tribe has done more damage
to Dharma than all the aforementioned Asuras combined. As such,
Macaulites are active collaborators, every bit the quisling as the
ex-Hindus who live in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Arabia. They disown
their Hindu-ness as dogmatic, regressive and backward, without
ever making serious investigation of their Hindu cultural roots.
Going to extreme lengths to claim their secular ness, Macaulites
are not averse to converting to Asuric creeds, with many more
having warm sympathy for them. As well as converting or sympathizing
with Asuras as an act of defiance and teenage rebellion, they are hypnotized
by Asuric attitudes: The veneer of love and humanity Christianity
attempts to purport; the power syndrome and supposed
egalitarianism of Islam; the pseudo-rationalist and
pseudo-scientific views of Marxism; and even quasi-Fascism by pure
racial identification with ‘apna’ (our) people to the complete
exclusion of all others, ignoring the very imprecision of racial
categories. Macaulites are in the forefront of mocking Hindus
loyal to the Dharma. To them this is a modernist attitude. Because
of their diverse nature, Macaulites come in many guises: the Hindu
girl who proudly parades her sexist Muslim boyfriend and
eventually converts; the Hindu girl who Anglicises her name, and
dates the Caucasian as a means of improving her own inferior
racial stock; the male Hindu chauvinist who wallows through a 3
year syphilis marsh to insist on being ‘traditional’ and
marrying a virgin; the pathetic parents whose offspring are
vagabonds, porn models, or just over-assimilated into Asuric
culture, that they argue how ‘modern’ they are; even the Hindu
‘leaders’ at the UK Hindu Marathon 2000 who take a stringent
stand against Hindu human rights activists like Dara Singh.
Macaulism also rears its ugly head in stranger circumstances,
among the masses of Hindus who claim to be non-Hindu. This
includes the mass of Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists. One can say that
the ideological foundations are Hindu and Dharmic. The modern
interpretation is certainly not, and so none, or very few of, its
present day ‘adherents’ are. Indeed they would proudly claim
to be non-Hindus and indulge in anti-Hindu antics, for if
‘actual’ Hindus disown Hindutva, then what point do they see
in being branded with it? Consequently they join the ranks of the
Asuras until it is their turn for the ideological guillotine.
The Macaulites therefore do the Asuras’ dirty work, with the
puppet masters consequently expending very little of their own
energy in mopping up the Hindu remnants. The Macaulite Hindus must
therefore be recognized as parasitic pawns of anti-Hindu
ideologies. Perhaps I have been too harsh in some respects. One
cannot really blame a generation whose elders made no real attempt
to engender understanding of Dharma among their offspring.
Consequently Macaulism has replicated itself with each generation,
and with increased potency. Dara Singh is a victim of these
Hinduphobic Hindus. Indeed any Hindu who runs into apathy and
intransigence when attempting to help their kith and kin is a
victim.
Thus Hindus are labeled fundamentalist, Fascist, backward,
violent, intolerant, dogmatic, irrational, fatalistic,
introverted, superstitious. Simultaneously they mange to be
religiously lax, assimilationist, over-tolerant, have amorphous
indefinable beliefs, sexually loose, and happy go-lucky. This
highly contradictory set of criticisms has disturbing parallels
with anti-Semitism. Where else would one find Christians,
Islamists, Marxists and Fascists united in their efforts? Jews
were accused of deicide or being Christ killers by Christians, and
some retain this belief or have transferred it to some fringe
Fascist Christian cults such as Identity. Muslims accuse Jews of
being the eternal enemy of Islam, of being Zionist racist
imperialists, and in league with Hindus in the 1971 dismemberment
of Pakistan. Marxists accuse Jews of being capitalist exploiters,
and hated their religious observance. Fascists accuse Jews of
being racial vermin, communist subversives, capitalist exploiters
of whites (and sometimes blacks), and anything else they can think
of. Hinduphobia is merely the logical extension of the same
Asurism which bore anti-Semitism, just another irrational hate.
This has allowed the Hindu genocide to continue unabated, and for
anti-Hindism to be an ignored crime without generating any serious
opposition. One should remember that although Asuras may never
unite all as one, they do ally in sub-sets: Marxist-Islamic,
Marxist-Macualite, Marxist-Christian, Islamic-Fascist,
Christian-Fascist, Macaulite-Christian. To them belong the terms
dogmatic and fundamentalist, because it is the Asuras who first
made universal principles from dehumanised forces.
Until Hindus actively counter this menace Hinduphobia will thrive.
Until Hindus stop their own self-hatred, Asuras will have free
reign. Until a new Shankacharya arises, Asuras will never lose
their arrogance. Dara Singh has faced persecution from the very
same Hindus for whom he was espousing full human rights and
dignity.
Unfortunately, most Hindus are Macaulites, ashamed of their very
Hinduness. To them it is an irrelevance, embarrassment, impediment
to living in the modern world. If only Hindus were to examine
their own Dharma, history, and cultural roots. They would then
relaise how the Devas made an alliance with the Asuras to extract
form the Ocean of Milk, the Amrit, or celestial nectar. The Devas
were compelled into this alliance for the common good. Without
doing so, they could not have used Mount Meru as the churn which
would cause the Ocean to yield forth the Amrit. It was foresight
by the Devas. The Asuras then grabbed the Amrit when it first
appeared. But their internal dissention as to who would partake of
it first allowed Vishnu to extract it back for the Devas. It was
shrewdness on the part of the Devas.
Contemporary Hindus have lacked both the foresight and shrewdness,
as well as the intelligence. They have always made an alliance
with Asuras for the common good, but each time come off bruised,
while the Asuras became stronger. Hindus do this even when totally
unnecessary, such as Gandhi’s Khilafat co-operation in 1922.
Hindus churn the Ocean by themselves, yet donate their hard earned
Amrit for free. The Asuras ensnare the Hindus many times under the
pretext of tolerance, the camouflage of dialogue and
understanding, thereby enabling them to steal more of the Amrit.
Hindus meanwhile squabble among themselves, with each petty ego
vying to compete with the next. Degenerate behaviour has
degenerate results. Hence Hindus are oppressed in Fiji, massacred
in Kashmir, and Dara Singh remains incarcerated. Yet Hindu do
nothing, but wait for their final physical and cultural
liquidation. This is to be the Hindu fate, a Hindu Armageddon.
(c) 2000, Arvasthan Singh Lahori
http://www.hinduunity.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
